Cilt 8 Sayı 54 (2020)

Araştırma Makalesi

Elektronik Tabanlı Öğrenme Sistemlerinde Eğiticinin Uyumu Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma

Yayımlandı 30.11.2020

  • Mustafa Alper Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı
Cilt 8 Sayı 54 kapak

Öz

İnternet tabanlı öğrenme sistemleri gerek yüksekeğitim kurumlarında gerekse de çalışma hayatında önem taşımaktadır. Beklenilen fayda büyük olmasına karşılık, internet tabanlı öğrenme sistemlerinin kullanıcı sayısı ve benimsenme oranı yeterli seviyelere ulaşamamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, mevcut literatürün taranarak internet tabanlı öğrenme sistemlerinin eğitmen tarafından benimsenme ve daha etkin uygulama imkanlarının geliştirilmesine yönelik keşfedici bir çalışma yürütmektir. Çalışma kapsamında, Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TKM)’ne bilgi kalitesi, sistem kalitesi, servis kalitesi, öz yeterlilik, öznel norm, algılanan kullanım kolaylığı, algılanan fayda, kullanım amacı ve sistem kullanımı değişkenleri eklenerek genişletilmiş bir Teknoloji Kabul Modeli elde edilmekte ve oluşan model değerlendirilmektedir. Çalışmada, 154 üniversite öğretim elemanına elektronik ortamda anket yapılmış ve toplanan veriler önerilen teorik modeli doğrulamak için yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları eğitimde internet tabanlı öğrenme sistemlerinin benimsenmesini gerektiren faktörleri daha da aydınlatmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler E-öğrenme, teknoloji kabul modeli, uzaktan eğitim

Abstract

An Empiric Study on the Adaptation of the Instructor in Internet-Based Learning Systems

Internet-based learning systems are important both in higher education institutions and in business life. Although the expected benefit is large, the number of users and adoption rate of internet-based learning systems cannot reach sufficient levels. The aim of this study is to conduct an exploratory study for the adoption of internet-based learning systems by the instructor by scanning the existing literature and to develop more effective application opportunities. Within the scope of the study, an expanded Technology Acceptance Model is obtained by adding information quality, system quality, service quality, self-efficacy, subjective norm, perceived ease of use, perceived benefit, purpose of use and system usage variables to the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the resulting model are evaluated. In the study, 154 university lecturers were surveyed electronically and the collected data were analyzed using structural equation modeling to verify the proposed theoretical model.. The results of the research further illuminate the factors that require the adoption of internet-based learning systems in education.

Keywords E-learning, technology acceptance model, distant education

PDF

Kaynakça

  1. Adams, Dennis A., R. Ryan Nelson ve Peter A. Todd. "Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication." MIS quarterly (1992): 227-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249577
  2. Ajzen, Icek. "From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior." Action control. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1985. 11-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
  3. Ajzen, Icek. "Attitudes, Personality and Behavior, Chicago, " IL Dorsey Press, 1988.
  4. Ajzen, Icek. “The theory of planned behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), (1991): 179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  5. Anderson, James C., and David W. Gerbing. "Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach." Psychological bulletin 103.3 (1988): 411-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  6. Andersson, Sven B. "Newly qualified teachers’ learning related to their use of information and communication technology: a Swedish perspective." British Journal of Educational Technology 37.5 (2006): 665-682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00563.x
  7. Bandura, Albert. "Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change." Psychological review 84.2 (1977): 191-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  8. Barrero, Federico, S. Toral ve Se Gallardo. "eDSPLab: remote laboratory for experiments on DSP applications." Internet Research 18(1) (2008): 79-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810849603
  9. Bagozzi, Richard P. ve Youjae Yi. "On the evaluation of structural equation models." Journal of the academy of marketing science 16.1 (1988): 74-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  10. Chen, Lei-da, Gillenson, Mark L. ve Sherrell, Daniel L. Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information and Management, 39(8) (2002): 705–719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00127-6
  11. Compeau, Deborah R. ve Christopher A. Higgins. "Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills." Information systems research 6.2 (1995): 118-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.118
  12. Condie, Rae, ve Kay Livingston. "Blending online learning with traditional approaches: changing practices." British Journal of Educational Technology 38.2 (2007): 337-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00630.x
  13. Cuban, Larry. Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
  14. Davidson, Julia Kathleen, and D. L. Elliot. "A comparison of e‐learning in Scotland's colleges and secondary schools: the case of National Qualifications in ‘Core Skills’." Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23.6 (2007): 511-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00250.x
  15. Davis, Fred D. "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology." MIS quarterly (1989): 319-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  16. Davis, Fred D., Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models." Management science 35.8 (1989): 982-1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  17. Davis, Fred D., and Viswanath Venkatesh. "A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments." International journal of human-computer studies 45.1 (1996): 19-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
  18. DeLone, William H., and Ephraim R. McLean. "Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable." Information systems research 3.1 (1992): 60-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  19. Delone, William H., and Ephraim R. McLean. "The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update." Journal of management information systems 19.4 (2003): 9-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  20. Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen. "Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research." Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
  21. Fornell, Claes, and David F. Larcker. "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error." Journal of marketing research 18.1 (1981): 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  22. Franklin, Cheryl. "Factors that influence elementary teachers use of computers." Journal of technology and teacher education 15.2 (2007): 267-293.
  23. Gefen, David, Detmar Straub, and Marie-Claude Boudreau. "Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice." Communications of the association for information systems 4.1 (2000): 7, 1-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
  24. Gunasekaran, A., Ronald D. McNeil, and Dennis Shaul. "E‐learning: research and applications." Industrial and commercial training 34(2) (2002), 44–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850210417528
  25. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, (2006).
  26. Hayes, Debra NA. "ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms." Computers & Education 49.2 (2007): 385-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.003
  27. Hu, Li‐tze, ve Peter M. Bentler. "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives." Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal 6.1 (1999): 1-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  28. Kadijevich, Dj. "Achieving educational technology standards: the relationship between student teacher's interest and institutional support offered." Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22.6 (2006): 437-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00190.x
  29. Kannan, Vijay R. ve Keah Choon Tan. "Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance." Omega 33.2 (2005): 153-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.012
  30. Legris, Paul, John Ingham, and Pierre Collerette. "Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model." Information & management 40.3 (2003): 191-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  31. Lin, Winston T., ve Benjamin BM Shao. "The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach." Information & Management 37.6 (2000): 283-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00055-5
  32. Ma, Will Wai‐kit, Robert Andersson, ve Karl‐Oskar Streith. "Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers." Journal of computer assisted learning 21.6 (2005): 387-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00145.x
  33. Marsh, Herbert W., Kit-Tai Hau, and Zhonglin Wen. "In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings." Structural equation modeling 11.3 (2004): 320-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
  34. Ngai, Eric WT, J. K. L. Poon, and Y_ HC Chan. "Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM." Computers & education 48.2 (2007): 250-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007
  35. Pituch, Keenan A., and Yao-kuei Lee. "The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use." Computers & Education 47.2 (2006): 222-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
  36. Rai, Arun, Sandra S. Lang, and Robert B. Welker. "Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis." Information systems research 13.1 (2002): 50-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96
  37. Rogers, Laurence, and Helen Finlayson. "Developing successful pedagogy with information and communications technology: how are science teachers meeting the challenge?." Technology, Pedagogy and Education 13.3 (2004): 287-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390400200184
  38. Russell, Michael, et al. "Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation." Journal of teacher Education 54.4 (2003): 297-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103255985
  39. Sahin, Ismail, and Ann Thompson. "Analysis of predictive factors that influence faculty members technology adoption level." Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 15.2 (2007): 167-190.
  40. Selim, Hassan M. "Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models." Computers & education 49.2 (2007): 396-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
  41. Straub, Detmar, Moez Limayem, and Elena Karahanna-Evaristo. "Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing." Management science 41.8 (1995): 1328-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.8.1328
  42. Szajna, Bernadette. "Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model." Management science 42.1 (1996): 85-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85
  43. Tanaka, Jeffrey S. " How big is big enough?": Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables." Child development (1987): 134-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1130296
  44. Taylor, Shirley, and Peter A. Todd. "Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models." Information systems research 6.2 (1995): 144-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  45. Thomas, Andrew, and Gareth Stratton. "What we are really doing with ICT in physical education: a national audit of equipment, use, teacher attitudes, support, and training." British Journal of Educational Technology 37.4 (2006): 617-632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00520.x
  46. Toral, S. L., Federico Barrero, and María del Rocío Martínez-Torres. "Analysis of utility and use of a web-based tool for digital signal processing teaching by means of a technological acceptance model." Computers & Education 49.4 (2007): 957-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.003
  47. Wang, Wei-Tsong, and Chun-Chieh Wang. "An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems." Computers & Education 53.3 (2009): 761-774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.021
  48. Venkatesh, Viswanath, and Fred D. Davis. "A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test." Decision sciences 27.3 (1996): 451-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
  49. Venkatesh, Viswanath, et al. "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view." MIS quarterly (2003): 425-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  50. Zhao, Yali. "Social studies teachers’ perspectives of technology integration." Journal of technology and teacher education 15.3 (2007): 311-333.